Universities / University of Notre Dame Australia
University of Notre Dame Australia AI acknowledgement
At Notre Dame, using generative AI in an assessment without explicit permission is an academic integrity breach. When AI is authorised, students must include a written statement of acknowledgement naming the tool, how it was used, the prompts and how the outputs were used, and also cite it using their school's referencing style.
Checked against University of Notre Dame Australia's own pages on 9 October 2026 · See the full rules
Write yours
Set to University of Notre Dame Australia's format. Tap what you did and copy the result.
University of Notre Dame Australia's own wording
"I acknowledge the use of [insert name of AI tool] to [insert description of usage]. The prompts used were [insert list of prompts]. The outputs generated from these prompts were used to XXX."
Quoted from University of Notre Dame Australia's guidance. The generator below fills this format in for you.
The rules at a glance
- When you need one
- When use of Gen-AI has been explicitly allowed or required in an assessment and you use it (check the course outline or Blackboard site).
- Where it goes
- A written statement of acknowledgement in the assessment; the course coordinator provides guidance on how to acknowledge. The APA guide also suggests describing use in the method section or introduction, with long responses in an appendix called out in the text.
- Prompts and outputs
- The statement must list the prompts used. The APA guide says to include a record of each question/prompt, the date and the response, and full text of long responses can go in an appendix.
- Referencing
- Use your school's style guide (AGLC, APA, Chicago, AMA/Vancouver) for in-text and end-text references. APA: in-text (OpenAI, 2023) or OpenAI (2023); reference "OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat". Interim APA appendix wording: "In an online chat with ChatGPT (April 06, 2023) ... In answer to the question ..., ChatGPT (April 06, 2023) gave the following response ..."
- Must include
- the Gen-AI technology or tool used
- how the tool was used
- list of prompts used
- brief description of how the outputs were used in your work
- Also note
- using Gen-AI in an assessment without explicit authorisation is a breach of academic integrity under the Academic Integrity Policy
- getting software including generative AI to produce the work (unless expressly allowed) counts as contract cheating/misconduct
- check the course outline or Blackboard site for whether and how AI may be used
- critically evaluate AI output
Sources
- https://library.nd.edu.au/gen_ai/overview
- https://library.nd.edu.au/instruction/referencing/apa7/gen-ai
- https://www.notredame.edu.au/students/support/study-support/academic-integrity
Your unit outline or the journal's author guide wins if it says something different. Spotted a change? Tell us.