Universities / Curtin University
Curtin University AI acknowledgement
At Curtin you can only use GenAI in an assessment with explicit written permission from the Unit Coordinator; if you do, cite any quoted or paraphrased AI text in-text and add a declaration after your reference list saying which tools you used, how, and the prompts you entered.
Checked against Curtin University's own pages on 9 October 2026 · See the full rules
Write yours
Curtin University doesn't publish a fixed template, so this uses a general format that covers what it asks for.
Curtin University's own wording
'Declaration of Gen-AI use' - I acknowledge using [tool, hyperlinked] in preparing and/or writing my assessment, to assist with (delete what doesn't apply) research, idea generation, clarifying, structure and organisation, writing (with in-text citations marking quoted/paraphrased text), or other; followed by 'I entered the following prompt/s' and a link to the chat.
Summarised from Curtin University's guidance.
The rules at a glance
- When you need one
- Whenever GenAI is used in an assessment where it has been permitted; in-text citation is required when AI text is quoted, paraphrased or summarised. Undisclosed use may be misconduct.
- Where it goes
- Declaration of Gen-AI use after the reference list, plus in-text citations and (where the style requires) reference list entries.
- Prompts and outputs
- Prompts must be included in the declaration (as a list or shared chat link). Students should also screenshot/save all prompts, outputs, edits and purpose of use.
- Referencing
- Cite AI as an information source in your faculty's style (APA 7th, Chicago, Vancouver, AGLC guides). Include a reference list entry unless the style says none is needed. No example reference given in these pages.
- Must include
- tool name, hyperlinked
- what the tool was used for (research, idea generation, clarifying, structure, writing, other)
- how it was employed to generate content
- prompts entered (list or link to the chat)
- date accessed and model/version (record these, as the referencing style may ask for them)
- Also note
- No GenAI in any assessment unless the Unit Coordinator explicitly grants written permission
- HDR students must discuss appropriateness with supervisors
- Do not upload work you don't own (lecture slides, assessment or tutorial questions) to GenAI tools
- Submitting fabricated AI output may count as falsification or fabrication
- Only the Curtin version of Grammarly is accepted; Free/Premium/Business versions use GenAI
- Microsoft Copilot in Word counts as GenAI and needs permission
Sources
- https://uniskills.library.curtin.edu.au/study/gen-ai/reference
- https://www.curtin.edu.au/students/essentials/rights/academic-integrity/gen-ai/
Your unit outline or the journal's author guide wins if it says something different. Spotted a change? Tell us.